☰ Menu

      Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis

Home
Introduction and Lectures
Intro to the Workshop and Core
Support
Schedule
Slack
Cheat Sheets
Software and Links
Scripts
GitHub repository
Biocore website
Prerequisites
CLI
R
Spatial Transcriptomics
Technologies
Introduction to Data
Part 0- Prepare R Env
Part 1- Data Exploration
Part 2- Clustering
Part 3- Cell type
Part 4- Niche
Part 5- NicheDE
Part 6- CCC
Part 7- Cell Segmmentation

Spatial Transcriptomics Part 6: Cell Cell Communications analysis

There have been many methods developed for Cell Cell Communications for single cell RNASeq data that rely on the expression levels of ligand and receptor pairs and explicitly defined functions. Some examples of these methods: CellPhoneDB, ICELLNET, CellChat that utilize the information in multi-subunit composition of protein complexes; SoptSC, NicheNet, and CytoTalk ues downstream intracellular gene-gene interactions; and scTensor considers higher order interactions beyond 1-to-1 cell interactions. Although these methods have enabled many studies detecting potential cell cell communications, the one biggest caveat is the lack of spatial context that produces false positives. Within the past a year and half, at least 3 methods have been developed for specifically spatial transcriptomics data. COMMOT, SCOTIA, and DeepTalk. Both COMMOT and SCOTIA leverage optimal transport model that accounts for both spatial distance and ligand-receptor gene expressions.

Here is the summary figure for COMMOT.

Cang, Z., Zhao, Y., Almet, A.A. et al. Nat Methods 20, 218–228 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01728-4.

Here is a figure from the publication of SCOTIA to demonstrate what type of analysis it offers.

Shiau, C., Cao, J., Gong, D. et al. Nat Genet 56, 2466–2478 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01890-9

We are going to do some exercise using SCOTIA.